|
"Interesting ..." by guests on June 23, 2007, 7:52 pm, in category General
|
|
|
Though some of the concepts were a little my head, in general, the theory youve presented is very enticing. If youre right, this very well could turn out to be an all encompassing theory, uniting the old science with the new.
Susan
Comments
|
|
|
"An Excellent Read!!!" by guests on June 23, 2007, 2:55 pm, in category General
|
|
|
This book has changed the way I view this world, this life and every concept that I have been raised to believe.
Everyone should have the opportunity to be enlightened by this excellent, beautifully written easy to understand, investigation of the meaning of life.
Finally something very credible, based on fact, scientific yet comprehensible
Thank you, Mr. Kermanshahi for sharing these thought provoking findings and for everything I have learned from this study......
Comments
|
|
|
"Book" by guests on June 23, 2007, 2:33 am, in category General
|
|
|
I just finished reading your book and just want to say it's an excellent book.
Keep it up.
M.
Comments
|
|
|
"Assertion C6" by guests on May 21, 2007, 10:01 am, in category General
|
|
|
Assertion C6 was written to substantiate the assumption that the same entity can represent zero and infinity. Since the mathematics used have been controversial, the assertion has been removed from the text.
Mohsen
Comments
|
|
|
"Zero and Infinity" by guests on February 9, 2007, 2:55 pm, in category General
|
|
|
One of the readers, had a problem with Assertion C7 that claims compatibilityof zero and infinity.
We rewrote the equations using Taylor series. This should clarify the issue and solve the problem. Please check the complex Number Section.
Mohsen
Comments
|
|
|
"Response to Jill" by guests on February 9, 2007, 12:56 pm, in category General
|
|
|
Dear Jill,
The nature of time is a big mistery. But we know from The Special Relativity that combination of space and time is the background and the bench for our universe. Also for us the arrow of time is always pointing to the future. Whereas at quantum scale time is symetric and future may come first and affect the past. This scrambles the cause and effect law that we are so used to it.
As for world to be periodic and recycleable, We do see it in our everyday experience and .....
Comments
|
|
|
"um... random question" by guests on February 7, 2007, 3:16 am, in category General
|
|
|
This is highly random but I'm a simple girl looking for a well.. apparently not so simple answer. I somewhat understand the basics of big bag theory and just about any other theory I've ever heard and kept coming up with questions that made no sense to answer cause every answer I tried didn't come out as common sense, (in fact one of the reasons why I was kicked out of church was cause I kept questioning the things that would make common sense) I have this habbit of over "analyzing" if you will .....
Comments
|
|
|
"Mathematical errors (take 2)" by guests on February 2, 2007, 2:38 am, in category General
|
|
|
This is a repost of my earlier submission, as I found errors in it which have now been corrected.
===================
I have found two mathematical errors in assertion C6 in the Complex Numbers section of Mr. Kermanshahi's paper.
First, in the equation:
Z = re^iΘ = re^i×0 = re^i(+N +(- N)= ri×0 = r (2)
there is a superfluous calcula.....
Comments
|
|
|
"Mathematical errors" by guests on February 2, 2007, 2:02 am, in category General
|
|
|
I have found two mathematical errors in assertion C6 in the Complex Numbers section of Mr. Kermanshahi's paper.
First, in the equation:
Z = re^iΘ = re^i×0 = re^i(+N +(- N)= ri×0 = r (2)
there is a superfluous calculation, ri*0, which shouldn't be there.
The equation, to give the expected answer, should read:
Z = re^(i*theta) = re^(i*0) = re^(i(+N + (-N)) = r
Second, in equation 4, Mr. Kermanshah.....
Comments
|
|
|
"Where did the Singularity come From?" by guests on February 1, 2007, 2:51 am, in category singularity
|
|
|
I am just a simple man but I have read much in resent months about the big bang theory. As I understand it at one time there was absolutly nothing. Then a Singularity exploded and out of something about the size of a dime appeared everying in our solar system and beyond. I am very puzzled, is there anyone out there that can tell me where the singulariy came from? As I understand it you cannot get something from nothing.
Aaron Lewis .....
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is the new format for Universal Theory Blog. Please feel free to post your comments here. If you do not wish to sign up for an account, please use "guests" for both username and password. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
June 2007 |
| Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
Sun |
| |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
| 4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
| 18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
| 25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
