In his recent book “The trouble with physics” ⁷⁴Lee Smolin, mentions that for any new theory in theoretical physics to be considered seriously, it has to offer solutions for five major problems in the field.  Underneath I am going to itemize these problems and examine the above model to see how close it comes to fulfill the requirements. According to him the new theory has to;

Problem 1- Combine general relativity and quantum theory into a single theory of nature.

This view offers the following answer; I have postulate that our space-time universe is spread over a mass-less, energy and information rich singularity and exposed to it in every Planck hole. In other words, Planck hole is the boundary of the space-time universe in micro scale. In such a paradigm, gravity is not the only factor. The fabric of universe in Planck scale is affected by energy from singularity as well. Therefore gravity is not the only source of energy to shape the space. On the other hand, according to Grand Unified theory, in Planck scale different forces are supposed to be unified> The energy form singularity is invariant and different forces are in a way in superposition of states. This energy can demonstrate deflective force as well. In wave-particle chapter I have further speculated that particles in their wave motion are under influence of this force. The particle’s oscillation back and forth to singularity gives the cranky shape to space in micro scale.  Since in majority of occasions the particles have to return the energy that they borrowed, back to singularity during their wave function, the turbulence does not extend far beyond Planck Scale, therefore we have smooth and curved spatial geometry in large scale.
I further speculated that elasticity of the fabric of space is the Counter-force, which returns the particles back to singularity. In Mass& Gravity Chapter I have proposed few scenarios where energy from singularity can curve the fabric of space.

Problem 2-Resolve the problem in the foundations of quantum mechanics, either by making sense of the theory as it stands or by inventing a new theory that does make sense. 

In quantum mechanics chapter, I proposed a possible solution for Heisenberg Uncertainty principle for location/ momentum and energy/time uncertainties based on the wave particle postulate on this model. Some other solutions for the paradoxes were offered at the same chapter.

Postulates of quantum mechanics are very well tested and proved to be real. On the other hand, the QM principles are very strange and against classical level logics. However these principles are not strange to our consciousness realm. Far more similarities exist between our consciousness realm in deeper level and quantum mechanics to deny their close relationship (see the quantum mind chapter).  Theories like quantum brain dynamics and alike are offering evidences for these similarities. Quantum mechanics makes complete sense within consciousness realm. We have be-er’s understanding of consciousness and therefore QM principles. We just need to depart from classical mechanics and space-time thinking and enter the new domain.

.

In this model I have postulated that reality consists of quantum mechanics, mind and astrophysics. The singularity is the medium that binds and correlates the above three components together. Quantum mechanics alone does not make sense , however within the context of a bigger picture where  consciousness is a model and singularity is in the proximity, postulates of quantum theory makes sense (see Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Mind and Quantum Brain chapters).

Problem 3- Determine whether or not the various particles and forces can be unified in a theory that explains them all as a manifestation of a single, fundamental entity

This model postulates that particles are different manifestations of one entity called thing. Different particles are produced by different frequency of the thing’s wave. Different frequencies of the thing introduce more or less energy to the space—time that is translated to different masses of particles (See particle –wave and mass& gravity chapters).  
I have further postulated that the energy in singularity is infinite and invariant.

Problem 4- explain how the values of the free constants in the standard model of particle physics are chosen in nature

In the Mass& Gravity chapter I have shown how the Planck constant can be the amount of kinetic energy delivered by the thing to the space-time. The above postulate perfectly matches and explains the different masses of standard model of particles.

An explanation for the rest mass of electron and other particles are also defined based on this postulates.
The gravitational constant also can be related to the oscillation of the thing (basic mass entity) and its penetration into space-time fabric (see wave-particle chapter). The frequent penetration can curve the space according to the mass of the object.

Problem 5- Explain dark matter and dark energy. Or, if they don’t exist, determine how and why gravity is modified in large scale. More generally, explain why the constants of the standard model of cosmology, including dark energy, have the values they do.

If we consider the mass and gravity as the only source that shapes the space, then the only possibility is to postulate presence of dark matter or dark energy. Within the context of space-time our guesswork is limited. However, in this model with the presence of infinite energy adjacent to the fabric of universe other speculations can be explored. Don’t take me wrong, there are evidences about the presence of dark matter out there. But we may speculate its source to originate out of space. Likewise the origin of accelerating expansion of the universe can be an external force bending the universe (external source for dark energy).

Consciousness

Consciousness is the tool that we use to examine the external world with. We'd better check this tool out and know it as best as we can. The new concepts of the nature of consciousness will revolutionize our way of thinking about our perceptions and understanding of outside world. They describe why we percept outside world in a classical level and not quantum mechanical level.  In the Quantum Brain chapter, I have discussed the mechanism how our classical views and classical logic are built inside our awareness.  

Zeros and Infinities
One may ask why there is the tendency to avoid zeros and infinities in theoretical physics. The answer is these domains cannot be designated to any entity inside space-time universe. All of the elements in our world is finite, Therefore infinity can not be defined in outside world. Zero is not measurable s we can not comprehend it. But the fact is zeros and infinities are very powerful elements in our mathematical calculations. So we have to embrace them. If we cannot accommodate them inside our universe may be we have to accept their existence outside it. Our everyday experience, modern physics and specially quantum mechanics suggest that there are factors affecting our everyday endeavor, which cannot be attributed to the familiar classical physics. Just like zero and infinity which are affecting math calculations but we cannot assign them to any element in space-time. It seems that we have to open our scopes to new horizons.
On the other hand, many believe that if an out of universe entity exists we cannot observe or understand it. So they prefer to leave it untouched or ignore it. The presented model in particle wave chapter suggests that we are constantly in contact with this entity in more a profound level. So by this definition, singularity should be comprehensible.

One may rightfully oppose this concept being a physical model because it lacks the mathematical structure that a physical model should have. Underneath, I am drawing this mathematically consistent structure to convince these readers.

 

This is a mathematically fine structure, but as Wolfgang Pauli once said, only the details are missing. I hope the details can be worked out by future minds. The main reason for not presenting a serious mathematical framework for the model is my lack of proficiency in mathematics. Any help from readers to construct a proper formalism for the model is greatly appreciated.

Many believe that if we accept a kind of outside entity affecting our world, we have to blindly accept a supreme power that we don't have any clue about it. This would imply that science accepts religion.
Lee Smolin describes it very clearly. He denotes, if we accept that amongst countless possibilities, our universe chose the one, which is hospitable to life, we have to accept that something outside our universe made the decision: 

“This is the exact point at which science becomes religion. Or to put it better, it will be rational to use science as an argument for religion.”²⁷ 

Of course, linking to religion with all of its shortcomings is not acceptable to mainstream science. Thus, this choice is out of question. However, this reminds me how fifteenth century priests were so afraid of any new scientific thought or finding. They were afraid that it would deny religion and god. So they religiously fought against the new scientific findings to the point that they would kill the scientific belief and the believer at the same time, if it was needed. They were scared and did not want to come out of their cave. One wonders, what would happen to their god if Galileo showed that the earth is round? Do we also avoid, kill and normalize a big portion of our findings and evidences just because it may shake our philosophical belief?

Carrying the myths and beliefs of our ancestors over only creates disaster. I can't imagine how anybody can take those kind of stories seriously. We need to build new theories based on today's knowledge. Traditionally humans take advantage of knowledge and intuitions of previous generations and use current findings to reach to new perceptions and beliefs. However, it seems that old religions are facing a dead end. trying to prove the old concepts by using today's knowledge is futile. We need a new vision.

Spirituality is a portion of our everyday experience. We have to redefine it but we can not deny it. Consciousness researches are in their preliminary stages. Future is going to reveal a new and exotic picture of reality. Surely twenty first century human is going to move ahead. Humans are truth hunters. Slowly but surely we are going to devolve into deeper levels of reality.
As I mentioned, one reason for objections that is normally put forward is that, anything beyond our observation tool is out of our reach and is not accessible to us. Thus, we cannot observe and understand it or experiment with it. So it does not fit inside scientific domain.
Above, I tried to show that some of the characteristic of the entity outside of the space-time is debatable by scientific methods. Quantum mechanics, positive cosmological constant, dark energy, dark matter, black holes and transpersonal psychology are expanding our horizon to the boundaries and beyond. Is it time the right time? Isn't it the time to at least fantasize, and hypothesize theories, which expand beyond space-time? I believe, if it offers logical solutions to our questions, it worth the speculation.

The arguments presented are open for debate. The reader is encouraged to email his/her inputs to correct, modify or develop the contents. Please send your emails to; zpfields@yahoo.ca 

Last Word
A new way of looking at the physical world is presented in this view. Roger Penrose suggests that:

“Physics has to find an objective reduction theory to connect Quantum level to Classical level. While these two levels are computable, the new theory has to be non-computable and non-local.”⁵

It seems this view meets the above requirements. Since the presented concept has the potential to offer solutions to some of our long lasting questions, it deserves further attention and speculation. This view not only can offer solutions for a number of unanswered problems in physics, but it has the potential to shed light onto many mysteries such as life and death, mind, life sciences and psychology, Para-psychological findings, etc.
Finding a new model to describe consciousness and spirituality is another very important task ahead. Old frameworks are outdated and unfit. New scaffold can work as a platform for a huge leap in history of mankind.

The concepts presented may not only change the way that we look at our world, it also can change the way we live.

 

Stop Global Warming