Co-written with Nahid Sahel Gozin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Classical physics has been developed over the centuries and has been quite effective as a base for science and technology. But many puzzles and paradoxes exist in quantum mechanics and astrophysics which cannot be solved within the context of the classical physics. Consciousness also remains a mystery. In fact, the findings of the past century defy the principles of contemporary physics. New revelations have painted a more detailed universe and present an alternative reality that we cannot explain within the traditional axiom. A brand new physics is needed to explain the newfound reality. That is why new fundamental theories are being introduced to explain the unexplained.
In this book, I will present an alternative physical model for the universe and offer explanations for existing paradoxes based on this new concept. In this model, the space-time universe is just an approximation of a much bigger skim which originated from an unconventionally defined singularity. According to the Big Bang theory, singularity is the zero size point that has initiated our universe.
In order to better follow this model, familiarity with the concept of complex numbers is helpful. I will try to explain the concept in layman’s terms. Alternatively, the reader may choose to skip the math equations and just look over the derivations made. Doing so will not prevent comprehending the concept.
First, I am going to explain the basic principles of complex numbers. Our physical interpretation of different elements in complex number mathematics will be followed in this chapter and ensuing chapters as needed. The interpretations and assertions made do not necessarily apply or accepted in contemporary physics. The analysis is derived and defined on the context of this model.
Complex number can be shown in a Cartesian plane where the x-axis represents the real value and the y-axis denotes an imaginary part of a parameter.

Imaginary Numbers
What are imaginary numbers? These numbers were first discovered by Omar Khayyam an Iranian poet and mathematician when he discovered the quadratic equation. They are the square root of negative numbers (√-n). Known mathematics could not offer a solution for this problem because no number could be squared to a negative number (like -1). Until 16th century, mathematicians avoided imaginary numbers like a plague. However, when Italian mathematicians discovered the cubic equations, they realized that to get a real number sometimes they need to use these imaginary numbers.
Since these numbers do not point to any objective physical element, they are called imaginary numbers and is shown by the symbol i. The square of this imaginary number would be a minus number like -1.
In today’s physics we attribute imaginary numbers to qualities that are in a sense hidden from us. Or better, qualities that do not possess objectivity. However these numbers denote potentiality. If we want to bring them to reality then we need some manipulation. By squaring them we turn them to a real number that would disclose them in our objective reality and can affect the real number equations.
Mind you that while any object contains measurable parameters; it also has numerous essences that are not computable or observable. We may assume that imaginary numbers are representing qualitative aspects of an object. These qualities are the base for potentialities that in turn can evolve the object to a new state in our perception.
Since neither objective or subjective qualities could be ignored, it was decided that a combination of real number and imaginary number is essential to explain any entity. Therefore complex numbers are chosen as a fundamental for mathematics.Mind you that I adopt the view that mathematics is an invention to simplify understanding and describing physical reality. Therefore,
Complex number = [ x (real number) + iy (imaginary portion)]

In 1806, Jean-Robert Argand, trying to give geometrical visualization to complex numbers suggested the diagram below:

Argand Diagram

This configuration confirms the need to consider the imaginary dimension in any measurement. In 1799, Gauss proved the fundamental theorem of algebra using complex numbers. Nowadays, the use of complex numbers pervades a major portion of mathematics and its applications in modern science. In this spirit, numbers are rightfully reintroduced as:
N = x + 0i
Where N denotes any parameter, x is the real value and i convey the imaginary aspect of the parameter. Since real numbers are zero thickness points occupying a one-dimensional geometric line, one can conclude that,

Assertion C1, pure real numbers are not real.

Real values occupy a point inside the diagram. Therefore have to have an imaginary number value (along the Y-axis)as well.

Underneath, the polar version of Argand diagram is shown where r = |z|, called the absolute value or modulus, and a = arg(z), called the complex argument of z. 

Every point in the diagram above can be shown as:
Z =x +iy =r (cos,a + i   sin,a)
  
x= r cos a, is called the  real part
  
iy = i sin a is called the imaginary part.
Does it sound like gibberish? It simply says that complex numbers are a combination of purely real and purely imaginary numbers.
 
Do not be disappointed if the definitions presented in this chapter do not exactly match the conventional definitions for the complex number system. The descriptions and assumptions made in this chapter are defined within the context of the proposed model in this book. As long as the assertions are mathematically sound, we should be able to rely on them use it as framework for the model. Complex numbers system is the mathematics of the more fundamental physics, the quantum mechanics. Roger Penrose points out,

“These strange numbers also play an extraordinary and very basic role in the operation of the physical universe at its tiniest scales.”⁵⁶

In this context, I infer the real numbers representative of classical physics and views and take imaginary numbers to symbolize the suppressed and therefore out of site portion of reality. The notion of complex numbers implies that any entity should have an imaginary dimension in its nature. In other words:
Assumption C1: Any being has a notable objective portion and not as obvious subjective qualities. Therefore, I conclude that at a profound level, just dealing with objective reality is not enough. Classical science views which deal merely with observable although good for simplification purposes, cannot reveal the whole truth. To get the whole picture we have to open our scope and include non-observable aspect of physical elements as well.
In 1707, Abraham De Moivre found a similarity between complex numbers and trigonometry. These numbers follow the same rules applied to trigonometric calculations. For example, when we square a complex number we double its phase (angle).

 

Z X Z= (x +iy) X (x +iy)
    = r [cos a+i sin a]× r[cos a+i sin a]       
     =r²[cos 2a + i² sin²a + 2 isin a cos a]
i²=-1
Z X Z= r²[cos ²a- sin²a + 2 isin a cos a]
cos ²a- sin²a= cos ²a+1/2  , 2 isin a cos a= sin²a
Z ²= r²[(cos ²a+1)/2+ isin ²a ]
Here, Z² is a complex number.  [r² [(cos² 2a+1)/2] is its real part and r²(sin² a) is its imaginary part.
In this text, we take point zero in the Argand diagram to represent singularity and the imaginary portion of the diagram to symbolize obscure aspect of the reality. In the contest of the brain Lateralization theory (LBT), we may take X-axis the left brain insight and Y-axis as the right brain perception.
Imaginary numbers are sometimes called magic numbers. One of the strange characteristics of these numbers is the fact that in De Moivre diagram, any real number coupled with (multiplied by) them will be reduced to zero. In LBT conception the coupling reduces the classical aspect and drags us to a holistic view of the existence.

 

As shown in the diagram above, when we multiply any so called real quantity by i, its real value (its real number coordinate value) is reduced to zero. Algebraically this can be written as:

(X+0i) i = Xi + 0(ii) = Xi = 0
In trigonometry we can show this with;

X = r Cos a, if we take a = 90, then Cos a = 0, therefore X = 0.
Assumption C2: Although the real number field may create the illusion of continuity, the more accurate complex number version shows us that the continuity of real number breaks down periodically.
Later on, I will conclude that fundamental physical elements (like space, time and matter) as we know them have to be discrete and not continuous. In calculus we can also show this fact by an evaluation of the function of (x) in any equation. We take y = x IxI as an example,

                                  y=f(x)=x│x│ 
Function
                 

                            y / =f / (x) =2│x│
First Derivative


y// = f /  / (x) =2 +4teta(x)
The second derivative exhibits discontinuity around point zero. A lack of smoothness and continuity in derivatives of real number functions.⁵⁶

For any other function of finite real numbers, we can come to a derivative which shows a lack of smoothness and continuity in real number field at finer scales.

We can take y = 1/x as another example.

 

Plot of 1/x

Although the plot is infinitely differentiable, it lacks continuity. The continuity breaks down as it approaches point zero. So inherently real number field are not smooth or continuous (holomorphic). If continuity is desired we have to incorporate the imaginary number and adopt the concept of complex numbers into the equation and rewrite the y = 1/x equation as y = 1/z. where z is a complex number shown as: z = x + ib, and b is any number. The above plots also reveal that discontinuity of real numbers occurs as the curve approaches the y-axis. Therefore:
Assumption C3: The pure real numbers have to be discrete and continuity always breaks as it approaches point zero.
Here, I conclude that as physical elements approach singularity their continuity break down and therefore they are discrete.
On the other hand, we can choose any other point in the domain and shift the point zero to that point and use Cauchy formula in the origin shifted form.


 n!/2pi∫ f(z)/(z-p)n+1dz = f(p),

And the nth-derivative expression would be:
       
n!/2pi∫ f(z)/(z-p)n+1dz = f (n)(p),p),

Roger Penrose writes:
“Thus complex smoothness implies analyticity (holomorphicity) at every point of the domain.”⁵⁶ Taking every point of the domain as zero is called blowing up the origin.
Assumption C4: The mathematics of complex numbers also indicates that any point in the domain can be considered point zero (cross section of coordinates).
This is important for us when we define the proposed singularity and its relation with physical reality in the next chapter. We will assume that singularity is present in every point of space-time.
On the other hand, the complex number equation Z = R [cos a + i sin a] indicates that these numbers have a periodic nature. So they loose their real number value and hit zero twice in each period. We take the periodic nature and intermittent appearance and disappearance of real value of measurable the basis for our fifth assertion.
Assumption C5: measurable in our perception have a discrete nature. This includes fundamental elements in our objective universe such as matter, time and space.
For example in the diagram below, if x-coordinate denotes the mass of particles, somewhere in its endeavor the tangible mass gradually looses its value and disappears. With the same token, if x indicates dimension and distance, because of the periodic function of complex system, they have to disappear and reappear during each period. This is the basis for our assumption that space and time are not continuum. They have to be discrete.
Let me remind you again that in BLT contest mathematics is a fabrication of brain to facilitate analyzing and understanding the reality.

Another interesting characteristic of imaginary numbers is the fact that although they are influencing the real numbers in equations, they normally do not mix up with them. In a complex number, we normally have to deal with each portion separately. For example for addition we write the equation as:

( 6  + 3 i ) + ( 5  + 2 i ) = 11 + 5 i

Assumption C6: The real numbers and imaginary numbers represent two separate domains. We take real numbers to denote objective and measurable portion and imaginary numbers to symbolize the so-called subjective aspects.

As mentioned above, in this model, we take the imaginary number (i) as a factor, which completes and closes the field and complex number the framework for a deeper realty that encompasses the whole existence.
In addition, in Cartesian coordinate system if we take x, y and z to represent different measurable in space-time like, distance, permeability, temperature, weight and so on, we notice that zero is located at the center of all of those observables (At the center of the line representing each value). However, point zero does not contain any of them (their values measured zero at point zero).

X-axis can represent time while Y-axis represents mass and z - axis may represent volume. Zero is in the center of all of these values.
Assumption C7: While point zero is at the center of any parameter in space-time, it does not represent any of them (values turn to zero at point zero). Formerly, I have assumed point zero to represent singularity.
On the other hand if any real value is engulfed by an imaginary domain, then any point of each observable is separated from other points by a kind of media. Therefore, any measurable is in a so-called, Hausdorff space.(1) The last assumption therefore will be,
Assumption C8: any parameter in our objective universe is quantized and engulfed in a media.
 
Summary
Although, the mathematics of complex numbers is highly developed, the physical interpretation of the complex system is subject to debate.
The concept of complex numbers opens our eyes to the combination of the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the elements. In reality, this combination is the actual nature of any being. Quantitative aspect alone does not convey the whole entity. They are just an idealization and simplification of our brain to describe nature. The book in front of you is not just its size or the number of pages, words or letters. It is much more than that.
In this model, I take the lead and intuition from the concept of complex numbers system and enter consciousness and the perception as an effective element in the construction and comprehension of the physical world. I further examine if this extra factor have the ability to take theoretical physics out of the current dead-end and can offer solutions to existing paradoxes.
I hypothesize that; zero is the center and  media for the universe and represents an entity here in after we call singularity. In following chapters we also examine the similarities between the singularity and consciousness. In addition, I take objective reality an artificial idealization of the actual existence. Zero have to lack physical elements because , the value of objective elements in it is zero. 
On the other and, zero encompasses the space-time and whole existence revolves around it (unit circle concept). Furthermore, zero exists at any point at any domain and field.

(1) the underlined words are linked to appropriate sites for further explanations.

The arguments presented are open for debate. The reader is encouraged to email his/her inputs to correct, modify or develop the contents. Please send your emails to; zpfields@yahoo.ca

Stop Global Warming